Scan your restaurant's website before a plaintiff's lawyer does.
Restaurants are the single largest target for ADA website lawsuits. 1,368 lawsuits were filed against restaurant websites in 2025 alone. A 30-second scan can identify the violations that trigger demand letters.
Enter your restaurant's URL. Get a WCAG compliance score and violation list in under 30 seconds. No signup required.
Sources: Accessibility.com 2025 ADA Web Accessibility Lawsuit Report; UsableNet 2025 Year-End ADA Digital Accessibility Lawsuit Report
Most restaurant menus are scanned images or exported as untagged PDFs. Screen readers cannot read a single item. This is the #1 violation cited in restaurant ADA demand letters.
Add-to-cart buttons, menu item customization modals, tip selection, and checkout flows frequently lack keyboard support and screen reader labels. Third-party ordering widgets are common offenders.
Date pickers, time selectors, and party size controls from third-party reservation systems (OpenTable, Resy, etc.) often lack proper labeling and keyboard navigation.
Many restaurant sites use ambient video or background music that auto-plays without pause controls. This disrupts screen readers and can trigger seizures in photosensitive users.
Dish photos, promotional banners, and gallery images without descriptive alt text make the site unusable for blind users trying to decide what to order.
Serial plaintiff firms send thousands of ADA demand letters annually. The typical demand for a restaurant website ranges from $5,000 to $25,000 to resolve without litigation. Most small restaurants settle because litigation costs more.
In California, the Unruh Civil Rights Act provides statutory damages of $4,000 minimum per violation per visit. A single plaintiff visiting your site multiple times can generate claims of $20,000 or more. California accounts for a disproportionate share of ADA web lawsuits.
Even if you successfully defend a claim, legal fees for ADA web accessibility cases typically run $10,000 to $50,000+. The ADA is a fee-shifting statute, meaning the prevailing plaintiff can recover their attorney fees from you.
The Department of Justice actively enforces web accessibility under ADA Title III. DOJ consent decrees require full WCAG 2.1 AA conformance, ongoing monitoring, and regular reporting. The 2024 DOJ Title II rule explicitly references WCAG 2.1 AA as the standard.
Settling one ADA lawsuit without actually fixing the violations leaves you exposed to additional lawsuits from other plaintiffs. Serial filers track businesses that settle without remediating.
Sources: National Law Review, ADA Title III litigation reports; California Civil Code Section 52(a) (Unruh Act penalties)
Find out exactly which WCAG violations are on your site. Fix them before they become a demand letter.
All food images, menu graphics, and promotional banners need descriptive alt text. This is the most commonly violated criterion on restaurant websites.
Menu items displayed as images of text (common in PDF menus) cannot be resized, translated, or read by screen readers. Use real HTML text.
The entire ordering, reservation, and menu browsing experience must work without a mouse. Keyboard-only users and screen reader users depend on this.
Menu text, prices, and hours must have at least 4.5:1 contrast ratio against backgrounds. Text overlaid on food photography almost always fails this.
1,368 restaurant ADA lawsuits in 2025. Find out if your site is exposed.